The student news site of Guilford College

The Guilfordian

The student news site of Guilford College

The Guilfordian

The student news site of Guilford College

The Guilfordian

Virginia District Court declares same-sex marriage ban to be unconstitutional

Since Amendment One passed in North Carolina on May 8, 2012, when inequality won and love lost, my faith in my country has plummeted to an all time low.

Born and raised in the South, I have always been ashamed of our conservatism, especially towards gay marriage that affects many of my loved ones. Even when it is not a personal matter, it is still disturbing to think about.

On Feb. 13, though, things began looking up.

U.S. District Court Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen for the Eastern District of Virginia overturned Virginia’s statutory same-sex marriage ban, finding it unconstitutional. This is one of the strongest legal reversals yet of restrictive marriage amendments in the South.

Since the Defense of Marriage Act was overturned by the Supreme Court, there have been 12 cases before federal judges fighting for marriage equality.  In every case, equality has won.

Of course, the South is no stranger to struggling with civil rights.

“We look at the history of marriage rights in the U.S., and it was once illegal for African-Americans to get married, and interracial marriage has been outlawed previously,” said junior Shelby Smith.

Today, we still have bigotry and oppression lasting from our dark history. What may be different between then and now is time.

“(Marriage equality is) one of the fastest movements that we’ve seen in civil rights,” said Cara Messina, secretary of Guilford PRIDE.

Many believe religious institutions are bound to slow down the freedom of marriage, but today churches are changing from within.

Jenny Shultz, associate pastor at United Church of Chapel Hill, married her wife during the Amendment One campaign at her own church.

“I believe that the truest form of the separation of church and state will eventually be what frees this country from her own demise,” said Shultz in an email interview with The Guilfordian. “While the government holds the ‘seal’ of marriage and the church, the ‘sacrament,’ there will continue to be controversy.”

Shultz is not the only one who married in North Carolina despite the lack of legality.

Garrett Hall, a private equity investor for AlpInvest Partners, met his partner at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and wanted to marry there with his friends and family present. With the legal stuff done in New York, he had the party in North Carolina.

“I hear the argument over states’ rights, that states should be able to decide these sorts of things,” said Hall in a phone interview with The Guilfordian. “But I think back to civil rights movements, and if states were allowed to decide these things then we might be in a very different place — a place I don’t think we, with our American values, would want to be.”

The counties that voted against Amendment One were the homes of universities.

Some claimed this resulted from highly educated people voting against Amendment One.

I think a clearer conclusion could be age.

“As younger people become voters across the country, the issue of same sex-marriage and equal rights for non-heterosexuals are not the wedge issues that they used to be,” said gay rights activist Nancy Sableski, school program runner for the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University, in an email interview with The Guilfordian.

I am not the only optimist. Leaders, ministers, students and people of all classes, races and sexualities are growing hopeful as well.

“Marriage equality cases are now pending in all but eight of the 33 states that currently forbid gay couples to marry,” said director of communications for Equality NC Jen Jones in an email interview with The Guilfordian.

“This avalanche of lawsuits, as well as meteoric shifts in public support for the freedom to marry, puts incredible pressure on the Supreme Court to sooner rather than later take up the issue of whether equal actually means equal.”

I believe that with the way things are going in this country, the question of legality of same-sex marriage is no longer “if,” but “when.”

View Comments (1)
More to Discover

Comments (1)

The Guilfordian intends for this area to be used to foster healthy, thought-provoking discussion. Comments are expected to adhere to our standards and to be respectful and constructive. As such, we do not permit the use of profanity, foul language, personal attacks, or the use of language that might be interpreted as libelous. Comments are reviewed and must be approved by a moderator to ensure that they meet these standards. The Guilfordian does not allow anonymous comments, and requires a valid email address. The email address will not be displayed but will be used to confirm your comments.
All The Guilfordian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • K

    Keith PullmanMar 1, 2014 at 11:30 am

    There is no good reason to deny that we must keep evolving until an adult, regardless of gender, sexual orientation, monogamy or polyamory, race, or religion is free to marry any and all consenting adults. The limited same-gender freedom to marry is a great and historic step, but is NOT full marriage equality, because equality “just for some” is not equality. Let’s stand up for EVERY ADULT’S right to marry the person(s) they love. Get on the right side of history!