The student news site of Guilford College

The Guilfordian

The student news site of Guilford College

The Guilfordian

The student news site of Guilford College

The Guilfordian

Poor communication leads to registration difficulties

For some students, registration for the current semester was fraught with problems which ranged from holds affecting registration to scheduling difficulties due to a high retention-rate and a large First-Year class coming into this semester. Unfortunately most of the difficulties that students experienced during registration stemmed from either poor communication or a lack of communication.

Senior Kirsten Larson cleared her holds a week before registration to ensure that she would be able to register the day it started. A few days before registration an administrative hold was placed on her account because the Financial Aid office had not received a scholarship check from a third party.

“Since the writing of the check for the scholarship was out of my control, I don’t see why such a hold was placed on my account,” Larson said.

Interim Student Financial Aid Services Director Paul Coscia said that the hold was placed on Larson’s account because the check was from a private scholarship provider and it is the student’s responsibility to keep in contact with their private scholarship providers.

Coscia continued, saying that students can’t attend Guilford College for free and the Financial Aid office has to place a hold on accounts if money needed for tuition isn’t in yet.

Another hold placed on student’s accounts dealt with thank you letters to scholarship providers. In Oct., students received an email stating that if they didn’t send a thank you letter to their scholarship provider, a hold would be placed on their account pending receipt of the letter which would prevent them from registering.

“It turns out I was one of many, many students who did not get the original letter requesting that we write thank you notes to scholarship donors,” senior Ruth Lowe said. “Many students who got the second, more demanding letter disregarded it since they did not understand what it was referring to.”

Lowe was able to register because she contacted Financial Aid and the Registrar to find out what the letter was referring to. Other students, however, did have problems registering because they didn’t contact financial aid to find out what the e-mail was referring to.

“This was something new this year, and basically, the Institutional Advancement had asked us to help them out with this process,” Coscia said.

An initial email was sent to students who were receiving scholarships from donors, then a check was run to see who hadn’t turned the letter in yet and a second e-mail went out. On Nov. 9 a third check was run to determine who still hadn’t turned in the letter and holds went up.

“I think it’s important that we find out where the breakdown is. We’re talking to Institutional Advancement because this was something we did for them and we know there were some folks that were affected at registration time,” said Coscia. “It’s not about passing the buck to any other department it’s about starting the process with the award letters and I know that’s in the plans.”

Senior Sari Schutrum-Boward also had a problem with this hold, which then caused another problem at registration time. Schutrum-Boward is dyslexic and because she was unable to register on the first day of registration, she was subsequently unable to enroll in classes that are appropriate for students with learning differences like Real World Chemistry and Biology 112.

“With the whole thank you letter problem, I was unable to get into a [science] class for a while and I emailed all these teachers who said, ‘sorry, we’re full,’ because by the point I could do it, everything was completely full except the really hard ones,” Schutrum-Boward said.

As a final-semester senior, Schutrum-Boward didn’t have the option of taking a class at University of North Carolina-Greensboro since their semester ends later than ours. She was able to communicate with the faculty and staff and managed to enroll in Biology 111; however, on the first day Assistant Professor of Biology Tom Tucker said that Biology 111 is recommended for science majors and that it will be difficult for those who are not science-minded, while 112 is.

“We do not have priority registration (for students with learning differences) and it’s my personal opinion that we shouldn’t have priority registration except in a few very rare cases,” Disability Services Coordinator Kim Garner said. “The American Disabilities Administration is designed to level the playing field. It doesn’t speak to preference, it doesn’t speak to getting you things that other people wouldn’t get.”

Assistant Academic Dean for Advising and Academic Support Barb said that about 400 students at Guilford have learning differences and it would be unfair to those without one to give a quarter of the population priority at registration.

Senior Raji Ward also had a problem with class scheduling. Ward’s dilemma began in late summer when she was notified via e-mail that a necessary nutrition class had been cancelled. The e-mail gave no reason or alternate class.

“I had it all worked out, I was going to have all my prerequisites done and then they threw this in my face,” Ward said. “There was nothing, there wasn’t anything like, ‘We’ll help you find another way to do it.’ There was no helping out and I was really stressed out.”

Ward ended up having to enroll in a class at UNC-G, but because she didn’t receive much help with the process, she discovered that she had accidentally enrolled in a graduate-level class. By the time she figured out her mistake, the under-graduate class that she needed at UNC-G was full.

“In the four years I’ve been at Guilford, I’ve felt like I’ve been very supported by the Guilford faculty and staff,” Ward said. “And I didn’t feel very cared for during all this.”

Leave a Comment
More to Discover

Comments (0)

The Guilfordian intends for this area to be used to foster healthy, thought-provoking discussion. Comments are expected to adhere to our standards and to be respectful and constructive. As such, we do not permit the use of profanity, foul language, personal attacks, or the use of language that might be interpreted as libelous. Comments are reviewed and must be approved by a moderator to ensure that they meet these standards. The Guilfordian does not allow anonymous comments, and requires a valid email address. The email address will not be displayed but will be used to confirm your comments.
All The Guilfordian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *