The student news site of Guilford College

The Guilfordian

The student news site of Guilford College

The Guilfordian

The student news site of Guilford College

The Guilfordian

Laurent Gbago trial sparks questions about ICC

Is the International Criminal Court really international? If so, why have no developed countries had criminals indicted?

The ICC, established in July, 2002, is the first permanent international court to be put in place. Tribunals such as the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia were created by the U.N. to try criminals during specific times and for crimes committed during specific conflicts prior to the establishment of the ICC.

The ICC has been accused of targeting developing countries, specifically in Africa. Since 2005, the ICC has issued 31 public arrest warrants and eight summonses, all of which were for individuals from African countries.

Former Ivory Coast President Laurent Gbagbo’s ICC trial for crimes against humanity began on Jan. 28. Gbagbo is being tried for his actions after the 2010 Ivory Coast presidential election. When he was defeated by his opponent, Alassane Ouattara, Gbagbo attempted to maintain his position of power through the force of the state.

During the conflict that followed the election, approximately 3,000 people died. Although the fault for this tragedy does not lie solely with Gbagbo and his supports, only he and his former militia leader, Charles Ble Goude, have been indicted by the ICC.

The lack of individuals who supported Ouattara and have been summoned by the ICC has caused quite a bit of criticism. Ouattara recently issued a statement in a meeting with French President Francois Hollande saying that he would “not send any more Ivorians” to the ICC.

Gbagbo had invited the ICC to the Ivory Coast in 2003 when he was facing a rebellion against his presidency for its strict citizenship policies. Before this the Ivory Coast was not under the jurisdiction of the ICC.

Gbagbo has already been incarcerated in The Hague for four years. Previous trials with similar circumstances to Gbagbo’s have lasted for several years.

When the ICTY tried Slobodan Milosevic, it went on for four years. Milosevic died before a verdict was reached.

This is the first time that the ICC has tried a former head of state. In the past, trials held by the ICC have been of former rebel commanders rather than political leaders with highly controversial careers such as Gbagbo. This makes Gbagbo’s trial a hot political topic.

“Let me be clear from the outset: this trial is not about who won the 2010 elections,” said ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda in a press release. “Nor is it about who should have won those elections.”

Although the trial itself is focused on the crimes allegedly committed by Gbagbo, the surrounding circumstances have caused a lot of attention to be placed on the ICC and its past cases.

“(The ICC) is exercising its power where it can” said Early College at Guilford history teacher Morris Johnson.

The ICC’s focus on developing countries may be, in part, due to the instability in many of their judicial systems. Although the ICC could prosecute leaders of developed countries, no precedent has been set for doing so.

It may be difficult to prosecute individuals from developed nations but not impossible. The argument that the ICC is incapable of indicting individuals from developed countries because they have not joined the court is inaccurate.

The U.N. Security Council has the ability to refer a situation to the ICC even if it takes place in a country that has not agreed to be under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, such as China and the United States.

The world will be keeping a close eye on the trial of Laurent Gbagbo as his case continues. This could be a pivotal moment with regard to the ICC’s future prosecutions.

View Comments (2)
More to Discover
About the Contributor
Rachel Henley, Staff Writer

Comments (2)

The Guilfordian intends for this area to be used to foster healthy, thought-provoking discussion. Comments are expected to adhere to our standards and to be respectful and constructive. As such, we do not permit the use of profanity, foul language, personal attacks, or the use of language that might be interpreted as libelous. Comments are reviewed and must be approved by a moderator to ensure that they meet these standards. The Guilfordian does not allow anonymous comments, and requires a valid email address. The email address will not be displayed but will be used to confirm your comments.
All The Guilfordian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • H

    HFeb 15, 2016 at 10:38 am

    “why have no developed countries had criminals indicted?”

    Well, for instance, because genocide, grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions, crimes against humanity and the likes, which are covered by the Rome Statute, are usually not committed by (nationals of) developed countries? And because the ICC is meant to act only when national courts fail to do so, something which is more likely to happen in states that enjoy great political unrest and a failing judicial system (aka developing countries)?

    I don’t know. Just some thoughts.

  • K

    kigen EmmanuelFeb 13, 2016 at 10:48 am

    Icc should press on with African leader whom they keep on misleading us. They should have step in Burundi like yesterday and those who want the country to tear apart be brought to book s imeadeatly