The student news site of Guilford College

The Guilfordian

The student news site of Guilford College

The Guilfordian

The student news site of Guilford College

The Guilfordian

Controversial law bans religious veils in France

On April 11, tensions flared in Paris, France, as a new law banning any face coverings was put into effect with the arrest of two women wearing the niqab — an Islamic veil which conceals all but a woman’s eyes. The official charges stated for the arrest were unauthorized protest.

The law has sparked a wide range of responses from Muslims and non-Muslims alike in France and beyond, who call into question the underlying reasons compelling this decision.

“It’s Islamophobic,” said Diya Abdo, assistant professor of English. “The French wouldn’t dream of doing this to other religious symbols.”

In 2004, the French outlawed any religious symbol from being worn in public schools and government buildings. However, crosses and yarmulkes are still permitted in public spaces, according to on-site personal testimonials.

While the new law does not explicitly mention niqabs, it is perceived as part of the political rhetoric.

In 2009, French president Nicolas Sarkozy stated, “The burqa is not welcome on French territory. In our country, we cannot accept that women be prisoners behind a screen, cut off from all social life, deprived of all identity.”

Abdo sees Sarkozy’s perception of women’s rights as problematic.

“The attitude is paternalistic,” Abdo said. “Many women wear the niqab by choice and it is offensive to assume that women are being coerced to wear it. This is a classic case of what we call the ‘white men saving brown women from brown men’ scenario.”

In addition to women’s rights, lawmakers stated national security as another reason for the enactment of the law.

“I don’t think it’s about security,” said Robert Duncan, assistant professor of political science. “It is a culture clash, and this is a particularly volatile combination. France is the eldest daughter of the Catholic Church, and remember, France and Algeria fought a bloody civil war not so long ago.”

The Algerian War, which took place from 1954 – 1962, was a decolonization movement resulting in Algeria gaining political autonomy after over 100 years of colonial rule by France. According to an Interior Ministry report published in 2000, of the 4,155,000 Muslims living in France, over one quarter were Algerian.

“If people are fleeing their home, they should understand where they are going and be willing to become part of the cultural systems.” said Duncan, who felt that both sides were responsible for the culture clash. “This is the French’s way of saying ‘if you want to live here, you have to assimilate.'”

A third argument put forth by officials addresses the issue of separation of church and state.

“The law as it is may not be perfect, but it represents a positive step in the separation of church and state,” said junior Daniel Saperstein, whose father, David Saperstein, works with legislature surrounding the separation of church and state.

“It’s an important issue, but it’s tricky,” Saperstein said. “We need to have the government as much out of religion as possible, but at the same time they have to set up the laws that keep them out of it.”

The line between promoting a secular state and prohibiting religious freedom is only one of the issues identified.

According to the Wall Street Journal, efforts to enforce the ban have been inconsistent. On April 11, the day of the first arrests, Rachid Nekkaz wore a Venetian carnival mask that left only his eyes uncovered, and joined a woman wearing a niqab outside of the Élysée Palace. Both were arrested, but only the woman was issued a ticket.

“I was wearing a full face mask on a non-carnival day so (I) should have been fined too,” the 39-year-old said as he left the police station.

“It shows that this law is biased against Islam,” reports the Wall Street Journal.

Despite apparent opposition to the ban both within France and abroad, the law passed by an overwhelming vote. The National Assembly passed the bill by a vote of 335-1, and the senate then passed it with a vote of 246-1, according to CNN. However, French officials are aware of the negative responses from citizens and world media that this law has generated.

“It’s not a racist law,” said Parisian Economist Laurent Berrebi to CNN. “It’s just a law that is coming from the history of France and so you need to accept it if you want to integrate into France and with French people.”

 

Leave a Comment
More to Discover

Comments (0)

The Guilfordian intends for this area to be used to foster healthy, thought-provoking discussion. Comments are expected to adhere to our standards and to be respectful and constructive. As such, we do not permit the use of profanity, foul language, personal attacks, or the use of language that might be interpreted as libelous. Comments are reviewed and must be approved by a moderator to ensure that they meet these standards. The Guilfordian does not allow anonymous comments, and requires a valid email address. The email address will not be displayed but will be used to confirm your comments.
All The Guilfordian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *