The student news site of Guilford College

The Guilfordian

The student news site of Guilford College

The Guilfordian

The student news site of Guilford College

The Guilfordian

Staff Editorial: New law fosters distrust in police

On Oct. 1, North Carolina House Bill 972 will take effect. Its aim, according to the first line of the paragraph long title, is “an act to provide that recordings made by law enforcement agencies are not public records.”

This means that any body cameras or dashboard cameras used by law enforcement in North Carolina can only be released to those in the footage.

In order for anyone else to obtain the footage, including for use as evidence in a trial, they must file a court action to have the footage released. Even if a police department wants to release a recording, they must get a court order for their own camera footage.

This law is not written to protect the interests of most North Carolinians. Instead, it is an attempt to make the very institutions that are supposed to protect us more opaque and less accountable.

This is not only of concern in cases like Charlotte, where the long delay and partial release of police footage drew local and national outrage.

For journalists, HB 972 means a long, drawn out process to report on police actions.

For community organizers, it means fewer tools to hold police accountable for racism and violence.

And for everyone in North Carolina, it means one less reason to trust police.

We pay officers salaries. We pay for their dashboard and body cameras. We pay for their cars and Tasers and handcuffs and guns and bullets.

And because this is a democracy, we have a right to know how they are being used.

This is why we have the Freedom of Information Act, so we make sure that public officials uphold the public interest. Law enforcement should be no different.

But under HB 972, it is harder for us to know if we are paying taxes for people to serve us or abuse us.

View Comments (1)
More to Discover

Comments (1)

The Guilfordian intends for this area to be used to foster healthy, thought-provoking discussion. Comments are expected to adhere to our standards and to be respectful and constructive. As such, we do not permit the use of profanity, foul language, personal attacks, or the use of language that might be interpreted as libelous. Comments are reviewed and must be approved by a moderator to ensure that they meet these standards. The Guilfordian does not allow anonymous comments, and requires a valid email address. The email address will not be displayed but will be used to confirm your comments.
All The Guilfordian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • W

    Walter HassellDec 9, 2016 at 5:19 pm

    “Instead, it is an attempt to make the very institutions that are supposed to protect us more opaque and less accountable.”

    The entire editorial board just revealed that they have exactly zero interest in understanding the views of their political opponents. I don’t agree with this law either, but holy moly, do you think you could demonize its supporters any more if you tried?

    If you signed off on this piece, you are part of the problem that is leading to an increasingly polarized political landscape. Think on that.

    Reply