2008 Woodie Awards
Housing crunch
Landry Haarmann
Issue date: 4/27/07 Section: Forum
- Page 1 of 2 next >
While Kris Gray may not have received complaints from many students after housing sign up was over, I've certainly heard people bemoaning the situation in which they've been put. Something is wrong with that picture.
Another year of Guilford is coming to an end, and with it, there was a mad scramble to register for classes, finish papers on time and, of course, sign up for housing for the upcoming year.
Once again the hectic first week of April has left some dissatisfied and others pleased. And me, I find myself at the butt of some cosmic housing joke, yet again.
After residential life put me with someone who I had never met and with whom I had nothing in common, when the person I had planned to live with didn't come back for the 2006-07 school year, I've been nothing less than pissed off.
So I was looking forward to a nice junior year in an apartment or a Mary Hobbs single and not living with someone I didn't know. The reality of the matter is that instead of a private space, I get to look forward to the concrete and cinderblocks of Bryan, which is the case for other people on campus too.
After being denied a single and the apartments filling up in the blink of an eye, I had limited options when it came to housing. Perhaps it had something to do with the lottery system.
The system randomly assigned numbers to students: seniors and rising seniors had numbers 1-999, juniors had 1,000-1,999 and rising sophomores had 2,000-2,999, and based on your number you were designated a time to select housing.
The lottery is school bureaucracy at its finest. The system has little communication, is chaotic and has turned students into little more than numbers. Don't you love being a number?
I was eagerly looking forward to living in an apartment, there seemed to be a decent amount of juniors in the apartments this year, and some just-junior groups, in fact. This is no longer the case.
I understand the Quaker values of the lottery system, but at the same time, I find problems with it.
Another year of Guilford is coming to an end, and with it, there was a mad scramble to register for classes, finish papers on time and, of course, sign up for housing for the upcoming year.
Once again the hectic first week of April has left some dissatisfied and others pleased. And me, I find myself at the butt of some cosmic housing joke, yet again.
After residential life put me with someone who I had never met and with whom I had nothing in common, when the person I had planned to live with didn't come back for the 2006-07 school year, I've been nothing less than pissed off.
So I was looking forward to a nice junior year in an apartment or a Mary Hobbs single and not living with someone I didn't know. The reality of the matter is that instead of a private space, I get to look forward to the concrete and cinderblocks of Bryan, which is the case for other people on campus too.
After being denied a single and the apartments filling up in the blink of an eye, I had limited options when it came to housing. Perhaps it had something to do with the lottery system.
The system randomly assigned numbers to students: seniors and rising seniors had numbers 1-999, juniors had 1,000-1,999 and rising sophomores had 2,000-2,999, and based on your number you were designated a time to select housing.
The lottery is school bureaucracy at its finest. The system has little communication, is chaotic and has turned students into little more than numbers. Don't you love being a number?
I was eagerly looking forward to living in an apartment, there seemed to be a decent amount of juniors in the apartments this year, and some just-junior groups, in fact. This is no longer the case.
I understand the Quaker values of the lottery system, but at the same time, I find problems with it.
Be the first to comment on this story